Thursday, December 20, 2007
Over the time I have used your text I have consistently received positive feedback. Currently I am teaching a winter intersession course (introduction to macroeconomics) and one of my students writes:
"Also, I think this book is one of the most interesting things I've everread, and Economics in general I'm now considering as a major."
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Friday, April 6, 2007
I wonder if you might consider having an item that asks your readers what books they think would be excellent for economics students to read. Perhaps each reader with a good recommendation could offer a paragraph or so about the book and why they think it's an excellent read for students.Over at Greg Mankiw's Blog you can review an excellent list of book recommendations.
Click here to see Greg Mankiw's 2006 Summer Reading List.
In addition to the recommendations you find there, I might suggest:
North, Douglass. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. His 1993 Nobel lecture is also worth reading.
O’ Rourke, PJ. On the Wealth of Nations.
A must read. O'Rourke summarizes the 900 page Wealth of Nations in fewer than 200 pages of readable a provocative analysis. He recognizes that the importance of Smith’s work today is for economic growth, development and poverty reduction. “Even intellectuals should have no trouble understanding Smith’s ideas. Economic progress depends upon a trinity of individual perogatives: pursuit of self interest, division of labor and freedom of trade” (1-2). In order to fully understand the first element of the Smithian thesis one can read The Theory of Moral Sentiments of chapter 3 in O”Rourke.
Sunday, April 1, 2007
Richard Shelton follows in the rich tradition of American travel literature his 1989 journey from
Clearly Shelton is concerned with voice and he exercises that voice to paint a wonderful view of his quest, but make no mistake, his purpose, like that of his predecessors, goes beyond the travelogue. Like Steinbeck Shelton names his van, coloring the audience view of this trip. Steinbeck had a quixotic atmosphere and Blue Boy evokes, for this reading, both the famous painting and a line from a long forgotten ELO lyric.
Shelton’s travel persona, like that of his predecessors; Twain, Stevenson, Kerouac and Steinbeck is not in control, that is the trip is the controlling metaphor for the narrative and “We find that after years of struggle that we do not take a trip; a trip takes us. Only when this is recognized can the blown-in-the-glass bum relax and go along with it. Only then do the frustrations fall away. In this, a journey is like a marriage. The certain way to be wrong is to think you control it. I feel better now, having said this, although only those who have experienced it will understand it." (Charley)
And so it goes with Richard Shelton, Blue Boy and the
Before turning to the motion and conflict at the heart of Going Back it is appropriate to ponder
Like Kerouac Shelton says, “And I am going back to Bisbee, not really knowing why?”(21). Clearly Shelton is playing the con game here, either with himself, with the reader, or more likely both, for later
Like Melville, Twain, Stevenson, Kerouac and Steinbeck,
Unlike the tradition of writers who document journeys or quests in American consciousness
He must go to Bisbee to his youth, the place of his marriage, the birth of his child and perhaps his own birth to confront the tensions that seem to characterize this middle aged Texan, transplanted to Arizona in love with the desert but in some way loathing himself. Unlike the frenetic gonzo trip of Kerouac or Thompson, Shelton quietly leaves the rat race in Tucson, leaves I -10 and takes the back road to Bisbee.
Notably the trip to Bisbee takes most of the book, the arrival is anticlimactic. But